Report to school administration or Title IX office (SoulGen content on Signal)

Why this matters for SoulGen content on Signal

• SoulGen accepts uploaded reference photographs which can be used to generate explicit content of identifiable individuals. This is the primary NCII vector for the service.
• Signal's zero metadata model is privacy protective for legitimate users but provides no platform side enforcement option for NCII victims. Content can be forwarded to other Signal users without trace.
• SoulGen content distributed through Signal typically reaches between four and twelve additional platforms within 72 hours through reposts, mirrors, and cross platform redistribution.
• Source attribution to SoulGen is critical for school report because it establishes the AI generated nature of the content, which strengthens statutory claims under 47 USC 223a regardless of whether the depicted person ever existed in unaltered form.

How AI generator removal works

What to do, step by step

1. 01
   Preserve evidence before any other action Capture full page screenshots with the URL bar visible, save the highest resolution copy of the content available, and document the SoulGen fingerprint indicators including soulgen outputs display a distinct anime adjacent rendering style even in photorealistic mode, with characteristic eye highlighting and a smooth skin tone gradient that does not match natural photography. Documentation of the content, the perpetrator if known, and the school connection
2. 02
   Run a biometric scan to find every copy across platforms SoulGen content distributed on Signal rarely stays there. ScanErase indexes 2.4 billion face embeddings across 200 plus platforms and identifies every current hosting location in a single scan, including additional SoulGen variations.
3. 03
   File the formal report with the institution File a written report with the school's Title IX office or equivalent administrator. The report should cite the SoulGen attribution, the Signal circulation, and any documented impact on the educational environment. Title IX requires school investigation regardless of whether law enforcement is involved.
4. 04
   Document the SoulGen source attribution SoulGen outputs display a distinct anime adjacent rendering style even in photorealistic mode, with characteristic eye highlighting and a smooth skin tone gradient that does not match natural photography. This attribution evidence is critical for the legal record and supports stronger statutory claims regardless of which specific action you pursue.
5. 05
   Coordinate with Signal platform removal Signal does not have content moderation tooling because of its end to end encryption and zero metadata architecture. Removal of content requires action against the sender directly.
6. 06
   File the complete evidence record for the legal track Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 for federally funded institutions provides the foundational legal basis for this action. Document every notice sent, every platform response, and every confirmation in a single evidence file. ScanErase produces this Verified Removal Package automatically as your case progresses.

Legal context

• Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 for federally funded institutions
• State student safety statutes requiring school investigation of student NCII incidents
• Signal cannot be compelled to remove content because it does not have access to it. The TAKE IT DOWN Act enforcement against Signal is therefore ineffective. The remedy is action against the sender under state NCII statutes.
• SoulGen attribution: Hong Kong operator jurisdiction makes direct civil action complex, but Apple App Store and Google Play Store policy violation reports have produced removal of the SoulGen mobile app in multiple regions.