Deepfakes of a manager or supervisor by a subordinate on Patreon

The combined situation

A direct report or subordinate employee has created AI deepfake intimate imagery, often following a performance evaluation, disciplinary action, or termination. This creates both Title VII harassment exposure for the employer and direct criminal exposure for the perpetrator. When this scenario plays out on Patreon specifically, removal proceeds through the statutory takedown process under 47 USC 223a combined with the scenario specific response that workplace cases require.

Why this combination is high risk

Patreon's paywall model limits casual sharing but creator accounts can be compromised and used to post unauthorized content. Adult tier creators have particular exposure to leak and impersonation risks. For supervisor deepfake cases, power dynamics in management relationships produce a documented retaliation risk when the subordinate perceives unfair treatment. ai tools have lowered the cost of retaliatory ncii production.

How removal proceeds

Patreon accepts NCII reports through its trust and safety contact form and through its DMCA agent. Verified creator accounts have identity documentation on file which supports law enforcement subpoenas. The documented employment record provides extensive context that supports both criminal prosecution and any civil claim against the perpetrator.