What Is Image-Based Sexual Abuse?

Researchers Dr. Clare McGlynn and Dr. Erika Rackley coined image-based sexual abuse as a term to accurately describe a continuum of harm that includes: upskirting and surreptitious recording; threats to share intimate images; actual non-consensual distribution; and deepfake or AI-generated content. The term 'abuse' is intentional, it frames the conduct as a form of sexual violence, not merely an embarrassing incident. This framing influences how courts, legislators, and support services respond.

Key facts about this term

1. IBSA is a continuum of harm, not a single act Image-based sexual abuse begins with non-consensual creation and extends through threats, distribution, and repeated resharing. Each stage is distinct and may involve different approaches for accountability.
2. The abuse framing is significant Courts that treat IBSA as a form of sexual violence rather than a privacy tort tend to have different standards for damages and platform accountability.
3. International law also recognizes the IBSA framework Australia, the UK, and Canada all have IBSA legislation that uses similar definitions. International requests for action may rely on this framework when content is hosted abroad.