Morphing differs from simple photo manipulation in that it blends features from multiple images rather than doing a clean compositing. In the NCII context, morphing typically involves blending a victim's facial features into an intimate image to create a depiction that resembles the victim while being technically synthetic. Courts in child protection contexts have long recognized morphed imagery of minors as CSAM. Similar considerations apply to adult victims, morphed intimate imagery of an identifiable real person is covered regardless of what percentage of the image is authentic.

Key facts about this term

  1. Morphed imagery is identified for exposure discovery Morphed imagery is combined within search requirements to provide a comprehensive view of possible exposure.
  2. The standard is whether the victim is identifiable If a reasonable person would identify the morphed image as depicting a specific real individual, it is included in exposure findings, even if significant portions are synthetic.
  3. Forensic analysis can detect morphed images Morphed images often contain inconsistencies in lighting, skin texture, and biometric geometry that forensic analysis can detect. ScanErase's biometric matching finds the victim's face regardless of morphing.

Frequently asked questions

Is a morphed image treated differently from a deepfake?

No. Morphed imagery is included in discovery tools addressing 'synthetic,' 'manipulated,' and 'morphed' imagery equally. The standard for identification is the same for all categories.

What if only part of the image contains my face?

If a reasonable person would identify the image as depicting you based on your facial features, the image is included in the discovery results. The fraction of the image containing authentic or face-matched content is not the test.