Report to the FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (Reface content on Signal)

Why this matters for Reface content on Signal

• Reface is broadly considered a low risk service due to active content moderation, but its model architecture has been replicated in higher risk derivative services.
• Signal's zero metadata model is privacy protective for legitimate users but provides no platform side enforcement option for NCII victims. Content can be forwarded to other Signal users without trace.
• Reface content distributed through Signal typically reaches between four and twelve additional platforms within 72 hours through reposts, mirrors, and cross platform redistribution.
• Source attribution to Reface is critical for report to FBI because it establishes the AI generated nature of the content, which strengthens statutory claims under 47 USC 223a regardless of whether the depicted person ever existed in unaltered form.

How AI generator removal works

What to do, step by step

1. 01
   Preserve evidence before any other action Capture full page screenshots with the URL bar visible, save the highest resolution copy of the content available, and document the Reface fingerprint indicators including reface outputs display a characteristic logo watermark in the free tier and use a recognizable temporal smoothing algorithm in video output. Full evidence package from the platform takedown including URLs and screenshots
2. 02
   Run a biometric scan to find every copy across platforms Reface content distributed on Signal rarely stays there. ScanErase indexes 2.4 billion face embeddings across 200 plus platforms and identifies every current hosting location in a single scan, including additional Reface variations.
3. 03
   File the IC3 complaint with full evidence File at ic3.gov with the complete evidence package. The complaint should specifically cite the Reface attribution and the Signal distribution. Reference the Ukraine (operator) / Delaware (entity) jurisdiction of the source service to support investigation routing.
4. 04
   Document the Reface source attribution Reface outputs display a characteristic logo watermark in the free tier and use a recognizable temporal smoothing algorithm in video output. This attribution evidence is critical for the legal record and supports stronger statutory claims regardless of which specific action you pursue.
5. 05
   Coordinate with Signal platform removal Signal does not have content moderation tooling because of its end to end encryption and zero metadata architecture. Removal of content requires action against the sender directly.
6. 06
   File the complete evidence record for the legal track 47 USC 223a as the underlying federal NCII statute provides the foundational legal basis for this action. Document every notice sent, every platform response, and every confirmation in a single evidence file. ScanErase produces this Verified Removal Package automatically as your case progresses.

Legal context

• 47 USC 223a as the underlying federal NCII statute
• 18 USC 875 for interstate threat communications when sextortion is involved
• Signal cannot be compelled to remove content because it does not have access to it. The TAKE IT DOWN Act enforcement against Signal is therefore ineffective. The remedy is action against the sender under state NCII statutes.
• Reface attribution: Delaware corporate registration supports direct civil claim filing in United States courts. Reface has terms of service prohibiting NCII use which support both account termination and civil claims for breach.